Current:Home > Contact-usNew Jersey voters may soon decide whether they have a right to a clean environment-InfoLens
New Jersey voters may soon decide whether they have a right to a clean environment
View Date:2024-12-23 15:52:47
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey, known as much for its beaches and blueberries as for the chemical plants and refineries that line some of its major highways, is considering asking voters a fundamental question: Should the state guarantee its citizens the right to a clean environment?
A bill making its way through the state Legislature would put a question on the November general election ballot asking, “Do you approve amending the Constitution to grant every person the right to a clean and healthy environment?”
Environmentalists say the move, known as the “green amendment,” is long overdue and would enable citizens to seek redress in court if they feel their environmental rights are being violated.
But opponents, including business groups, warn that the law could have unintended consequences. They say it could enable foes of one of New Jersey’s main efforts to fight climate change — building offshore wind projects — to challenge and kill the projects in court, saying their right to a clean ocean was being violated.
Three states — Montana, New York and Pennsylvania — have established constitutional rights to a clean environment via similar amendments, but another 15 either are considering such measures or are expected to do so soon, said Maya van Rossum, founder of Green Amendments For The Generations and head of the Delaware Riverkeeper organization in New Jersey.
“We have communities in New Jersey thar are being harmed by air and water pollution despite all these laws we have on the books to protect them,” she said, adding that the proposal, if enacted, would reorient environmental protection toward preventing pollution rather than acting after the fact to address it.
“Right now, governmental officials may think it’s a good idea to protect the environment and may want to do it, but they don’t have a constitutional demand to do it,” she said.
Democratic state Sen. Linda Greenstein, sponsor of the bill, said it would guarantee the fundamental parts of a healthy daily life.
“That means clean water to drink, clean air to breathe and enjoyment of our natural spaces, constitutionally guaranteed to every New Jerseyan today and tomorrow,” she said. “These things should not be considered a privilege afforded to some.”
But the bill does not spell out how the law would work in practice. It designates no entity as the enforcer of the law or the adjudicator of disputes regarding it. That would appear to leave the court system as the main avenue for those who feel aggrieved.
“It would wind up in front of a judge,” Greenstein acknowledged, although she said some preliminary steps including mediation could also be used.
She said lawmakers may need to add language spelling out how the law would work and be enforced.
Ray Cantor, of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association, said the law could have unintended consequences. He said it could enable people who oppose offshore wind power projects to challenge them in court.
“Our concern is many don’t understand the ramifications of this resolution,” he said.
Greenstein and officials with several environmental groups said they do not consider that likely.
The measure would decree that “the state’s natural resources, among them its waters, air, flora, fauna, climate, and public lands, are the common property of all the people, including both present and future generations. The state shall serve as trustee of these resources, and shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all people.”
But Bill Wolfe, a former official with the state Department of Environmental Protection and a frequent critic of the agency, said the state already is the trustee of those resources under the Public Trust Doctrine, a legal concept dating back to the Roman Empire that the state has adopted in other areas, including access to beaches and waterways.
“The bill is deeply flawed, and I believe it is more performative than a serious effort,” he said.
Doug O’Malley, of Environment New Jersey, called the bill “the fire axe behind glass that you break in case of emergency.”
“You don’t use it every day, but it’s good to know you have it there in case you need it,” he said.
He and others said they do not expect a flood of litigation as a result of the new law, citing the experiences of other states that have enacted similar provisions.
Several measures have been added to the bill through amendments, including adding “a safe climate” to the list of protected resources, and adding environmental justice concerns to it, according to Democratic Sen. Bob Smith, chairman of the senate committee that advanced the bill on Thursday.
It still requires multiple levels of approval before being placed on the November ballot.
___
Follow Wayne Parry on X, formerly Twitter, at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC
veryGood! (5)
Related
- US Congress hopes to 'pull back the curtain' on UFOs in latest hearing: How to watch
- Who has the best AI? Tech expert puts ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity to the test
- Jean Breaux, longtime Democratic state Senator from Indianapolis, dies at 65
- Alyssa Raghu denies hijacking friend's 'American Idol' audition, slams show's 'harmful' edit
- Messi breaks silence on Inter Miami's playoff exit. What's next for his time in the US?
- Tom Izzo: Automatic bids for mid-major programs in NCAA Tournament 'got to be looked at'
- Jeopardy!'s Mike Richards Speaks Out More Than 2 Years After Being Fired From Hosting Gig
- Head of fractured Ohio House loses some GOP allies, but may yet keep leadership role amid infighting
- Will Aaron Rodgers retire? Jets QB tells reporters he plans to play in 2025
- 'Chester' gets limo ride out of animal shelter after nearly 600 days waiting for adoption
Ranking
- Hurricane-stricken Tampa Bay Rays to play 2025 season at Yankees’ spring training field in Tampa
- Sanctuary saved: South Carolina family's fight for ancestral land comes to an end after settlement: Reports
- Cicadas 2024: This year's broods will make for rare event not seen in over 200 years
- Sanctuary saved: South Carolina family's fight for ancestral land comes to an end after settlement: Reports
- Glen Powell Addresses Rumor He’ll Replace Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible Franchise
- Florida homeless to be banned from sleeping in public spaces under DeSantis-backed law
- California voters pass proposition requiring counties to spend on programs to tackle homelessness
- It's Showtime: See Michael Keaton's Haunting Transformation for Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Role
Recommendation
-
North Carolina offers schools $1 million to help take students on field trips
-
Jean Breaux, longtime Democratic state Senator from Indianapolis, dies at 65
-
Mississippi deputies arrest 14-year-old in mother’s shooting death, injuring stepfather
-
Kate Middleton’s Medical Records Involved in ICO Investigation After Alleged Security Breach
-
Rafael dissolves into a low pressure system in the Gulf of Mexico after hitting Cuba as a hurricane
-
Fate of Texas immigration law SB4 allowing for deportation now in 5th Circuit court's hands
-
March Madness predictions: 7 Cinderella teams that could bust your NCAA Tournament bracket
-
Federal officials want to know how airlines handle — and share — passengers’ personal information